Last year, when I attended a
sociological conference, I was part of a panel discussing how to get a book
published. At the time, I had written
sixteen books and hence had a fair understanding of how this happened.
One of my co-panelists, who
had written fewer works, insisted that conservatives dominated the publishing industry. They supposedly owned the businesses and
discriminated against liberals. He,
therefore, bragged that, in getting his books into print, he had spoken truth
to power—and gotten away with it.
In fact, liberals have long
since ceased speaking truth to power.
Nowadays, they scarcely speak it to anyone, including themselves. They have become such rigid ideologues that they
cannot tell the difference between phony talking points and reality.
If the truth be known,
liberals are often the ones in power. For
nearly a century, it has been that way. This is certainly true in publishing. Most of the biggest houses are owned and run
by liberals who are reluctant to publish views that run counter to their own.
Plainly, liberals own the New
York Times and the Washington Post.
As a consequence, their editorial policies do not run counter to those
who pay the bills. Nor do the opinions
expressed in the mainstream media. Here
too those in charge of what makes it onto the airwaves are part of a liberal
establishment.
The same is patently the
case when we examine who runs the federal bureaucracy. Progressives are entrenched in the deep
state. Lois Lerner was able to get away
with discriminating against conservatives when at the IRS because most of the
agency’s managers were liberal. As such,
her tactics did not offend them.
Nowadays, I work at a
university. As bastions of higher
education go, KSU is more tolerant than most.
Nonetheless, conservatives have learned to be careful about what they
say. We recently had a conservative
speaker (Katie Pavlich) whose sponsors were obliged to pay for extra security,
precisely because liberals frequently seek to shut down voices they find
controversial.
Even when I write columns
about the vices of neo-Marxists, I can expect liberal pushback. Many more than once, progressive readers have
demanded that I no longer be allowed to write for the MDJ or Cherokee
Tribune. These folks assume that they
have a right to dictate editorial policy.
This liberal sense of
entitlement has become pervasive precisely because leftists so often control contemporary
seats of power. Although they pretend to
be weak outsiders, who are mercilessly suppressed by conservative tyrants, the
opposite is more nearly true.
Many times, readers commend
me for the courage to say out loud what they privately think. By the same token, I am frequently asked how
I have managed to survive for so long on a college campus. These folks react this way because they are aware
of how autocratic liberals can be.
Speaking truth to power is a
good thing. It is one of the virtues
that make democracy possible. But
nowadays, it is conservatives who must exhibit the audacity to speak up. It is they who are more likely to be punished
by the powers that be.
Once upon a time, liberals
believed in tolerance. They insisted on
the value of an open marketplace of ideas.
Those days are gone. Today’s
liberals assume that if you disagree with them, you are a moral monster who
must be stopped. They refuse even to
listen to views that contradict their own.
But how are we to decide
what is right in such an environment? If
free speech includes only liberal speech, we are doomed. If the first response of liberals is to gag
those who challenge them and their second is to ruin the careers of those they
find offensive, can a gulag be far behind?
Conservatives believe in
liberty, which should include the ability to speak truth to power. Liberals must understand that they too ought
to honor the rules for which they once so valiantly fought. Instead of reflexively muzzling their
opponents, they might want to listen to them.
Power, as Lord Acton warned,
corrupts. Guess what, it corrupts
liberals too. If they do not realize that
they are abusing their power, they are more likely to do so!
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment