Saturday, July 16, 2016

Hispanic Immigration in Cherokee County


Not long ago Cherokee County was very rural and very white.  But then I-575 changed everything.  Suddenly it was part of the Atlanta metropolitan complex.  And with this came an influx of outsiders.  Some of them were professionals like me, but others were illegal migrants from Latin America.
Indeed, it will not be many years before twenty percent of this region is Hispanic.  This must inevitably change the character of the community.  In addition to affluent exurbs, there will be semi-rural ghettos.  Although most of their residents will be out of sight, they will nevertheless require attention.
Before I continue, let me make my attitude toward immigration plain.  My grandparents were immigrants from Russia.  My wife’s grandparents were immigrants from Germany.  At Kennesaw State University, I have colleagues from Romania, Germany, Korea, Thailand, India, and Ghana.  They are valued associates whom I have no intention of sending back from whence they came.
I, therefore, favor immigration—but only legal immigration.  If we, as a nation, cannot control our borders, it will not be long before we will be a very different kind of country.  A flood of cultural diversity will swamp our prosperity and freedoms.
Let me explain.  Our democratic institutions and capitalistic economy evolved slowly.  It took centuries of experimentation to reach our current level of success.  Moreover, there is nothing inevitable about their continued viability.  These must be nurtured if they are to remain strong.
In the past, as assorted waves of immigration broke on our shores, we have had the time to assimilate these newcomers into our way of life.  They started as poor greenhorns, but their children and grandchildren learned English and discovered what it meant to be part of a free country.
For some groups, this journey was shorter than others.  Thus, the Germans assimilated more quickly than the Irish, while the Jews did so more rapidly than the Italians.  What made the difference was how congenial their culture of origin was to the American culture.
It turns out that peasant populations take longer to adjust to an urban industrial society.  They have little experience with complicated technologies or market economies.  Back from where they came, their aspirations tended to be submerged by a landed gentry.
As a result, they are not oriented toward participating in democratic institutions.  Nor are they concerned with encouraging their children to get a better education.  What matters to them is survival.  They want to work and live more comfortably.
For the most part, they succeed in this.  And because they do, their children raise their sights.  They begin to understand what their parents don’t.  This enables them to begin the transition to Americanism.  It also provides a foundation for their own children to make even greater strides.
But this too is a slow process.  It can, however, be hindered by the ambience in which immigrants are surrounded.  If their numbers are extremely large, they may find themselves residing in communities that are not very different from their homelands.  They will speak the same language and maintain the same attitudes.
Yet if they do, it will be more difficult to learn how to be American.  Consequently, if we simply ignore this problem by insisting that diversity is a value in itself, we are, in fact, discouraging assimilation.  Furthermore, pockets of non-integrated populations, if they are too extensive, may overwhelm the whole.
The point is that for immigration to work, it has to be regulated.  The numbers, especially from poor hinterland communities, must be such that they facilitate incorporation into our society.  This is not an anti-immigrant attitude; it is pro-immigrant.
No one is helped, least of all the immigrants, if they become a pariah people in the United States.  If they develop into a segregated lower class, they will endure the pain of discrimination.  The rest of the country will also suffer.  We will lose the contributions these folks might otherwise make in exchange for importing a disruptive minority.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology

Kennesaw State University

No comments:

Post a Comment