A few weeks ago I
participated in a panel sponsored by the Cherokee County Republican
Assembly. The question was: Did the
Conservatives lose the culture war? According
to businessman Alex Gimenez, they did.
Given that liberals have captured the media and schools, he identified these
folks as setting our cultural agenda.
Matthew Perdie, a
documentary moviemaker, disagreed. He
argued that Donald Trump’s electoral victory demonstrates that political
correctness is on the wane. As for
Catherine Bernard, a lawyer, she was more equivocal. She suggested that conservatives should be
more tolerant of minorities.
In my opinion, however,
nobody won the culture wars. Liberals,
conservatives, and libertarians alike were losers. Each faction promoted a program that is now in
tatters. All made promises that were not
kept. The result is a stalemate in which
each side still expects to claim victory.
The reason that none will is
because they are out of date. All three endorse
ideas created hundreds or thousands of years ago. None was specifically designed to address the
problems we currently experience.
Thus many conservatives urge
us to embrace religious verities. They
tell us that if we recommit to laws handed down by a merciful God, we will
regain his favor. We must therefore love
one another. We are to treat each other essentially
as siblings so as to safeguard our collective welfare.
This strategy will not work
because too many Americans are secular.
They refuse to embrace the old-time religion. Nor can three hundred and thirty million
people truly love one another. Although
they may behave decently toward strangers, they are not, and never will be, kin.
As for the libertarians,
they advise us to become entrepreneurs.
If we are free to pursue our private interests in an unfettered
marketplace, we will all be better off.
The problem with this approach is twofold. First, we are not equally talented or
aggressive. Second, this leaves love
entirely out of the equation.
Although the liberals have
been dominant for about a century, they too aspire to the untenable. They tell us to turn to the government for
salvation. If we allow its experts to
make decisions we are incapable of making for ourselves, we will prosper as
never before.
The liberals call this
social justice and explain that a fully democratic regime will create complete
equality. Once it controls the means of
production, it will ensure that everyone receives a fair share. With greed having been suppressed by a myriad
of regulations and affirmative action empowering the least formidable among us,
the playing field will finally be level.
Except that we have now had
some experience with residing under a bureaucratic yoke. Government experts turn out to be at least as
corrupt as the industrial moguls who preceded them. Their version of political correctness pits
minority groups against one another such that it is the politicians who enrich
themselves.
No one is happy with the
current situation because no one has obtained the alleged benefits. As it happens, we have developed into a mass
techno-commercial society. This ushered
in undreamt of wealth and a myriad of choices.
But it also introduced unprecedented insecurities.
With so much power at our
disposal, we are today capable of big mistakes.
The traditional ideologies guarded against these. Religion gave us divinely inspired
answers. The marketplace stimulated a
multitude of technical and political innovations. As for the progressives, they offered relief from
frightening choices by making these for us.
The alternative to these failed
worldviews is for us to take care of ourselves.
If we become emotionally mature grown-ups who understand the problems
before us, we can individually determine what is best for us personally and
collectively. As self-motivated experts,
we ought to learn from the traditional philosophies so as to take charge of our
destinies.
The problem with this option,
however, is that it thrusts the responsibility upon us. Aside from the hard work it takes to master
contemporary complexities, if things go wrong, we will be to blame. This prospect has already stimulated a flight
from freedom and reanimated cultural solutions that have hitherto demonstrated
major limitations.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment