I do not have a Twitter
account. Nor do I expect to open
one. So far as I can see, the space-limited
blurbs in which this form of communication specializes are too shallow and
egocentric for my tastes. My preference
is for books and columns that are better thought through.
As a consequence, I never
expected to write something about Donald Trump’s tweets. While I understood that this was one of the
tools he used to get elected and that he continues to employ it to circumvent a
hostile media, my own interests lie elsewhere.
What changed my mind is that
our president’s Twitter remarks have come to dominate the news. Not what he does in his official capacity,
but what he composes in the dead of night or in response to his detractors has
captured the imagination of the reporters who cover him.
Journalistic disapproval of
what he conveys has become the cudgel with which his enemies beat him around
the head and shoulders. These harpies
are ready to pounce any time he writes something that can be unfavorably
construed. They obviously hope some of
their blows will prove fatal.
The latest brouhaha
concerned Mika Brzezinski. She, along
with her MSNBC co-host Joe Scarborough, has been leveling malicious insults at
Trump for months. Although they were
once on apparently on friendly terms, the recent allegations have been
scathing.
In any event, the president
decided to fight back. Not only did he
decry what was said, but he made an unflattering remark about Mika bleeding
during a visit to his home. He implied
that this was caused by a facelift.
That’s all he said, but it
was enough for the sky to fall on his head.
For days, this utterance pushed every other piece of news off the front
pages. A travel ban had gone into
effect, sanctions were levied against China to induce it to help with North
Korea, and negotiations to repeal and replace ObamaCare remained under way.
Nevertheless, the offending
tweet counted for more. During an
ensuing press briefing, at least three quarters of the questions concerned
it. Actually, they were not
questions. They were accusations
disguised as questions.
Thus, the big one asked of
Sarah Huckabee Sanders was: Isn’t the president ashamed of what he wrote? Then she was asked if she was ashamed of what
he said. Next she was asked is members
of congress were ashamed. The obvious
intent was to elicit an admission that they should all be ashamed.
Now, I admit that what Trump
tweeted was not gentlemanly. It is not
something I would have said.
Nonetheless, the things that Brzezinski said were not ladylike. Opining not once, but many times, that the
president was “crazy” is not customarily regarded that the proper etiquette for
a political critique.
Sanders described the
president as fighting fire with fire. It
may also be assumed that months of discourteous recriminations occasionally get
under his skin. These do not excuse his
crudity, but they help explain it—especially when coming from a New York City street
fighter.
But let us keep in mind that
female journalists can also go over the line.
Trump was characterized as having insulted all women, yet that assumes
any rough handling of a woman reporter is, ipso facto, out of bounds. Truman said, “if you can’t stand the heat,
get out of the kitchen.” Shouldn’t that
apply to women when they launch public attacks?
Some pundits claim that
Trump is stomping on his own message when he makes intemperate tweets. They consequently recommend that he keep his
candid responses to himself. Actually
they did the same to Truman when he came to the defense of his daughter
Margaret’s singing ability.
The fact is that no matter
what Trump says or does, the reporters who despise him will find something to
turn into a scandal. The president could
cancel his Twitter account and it would make no difference.
These twitter storms are, in
reality, an amusing sideshow. While they
can be unpresidential, the response to them has not been journalistic. Reporters, who are convinced that something
untoward is happening, should first look in the mirror.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment