I have recently written columns
about principled realism and social individualism. These were put forward as an antidote to the
ideological crisis we are currently experiencing. Yet if liberalism, conservatism, and
libertarianism are obsolete, can these alternatives fill the vacuum?
Last week, I spoke about our
need for balance. By themselves, none of
the old truisms are sufficient for our purposes. None answers all of our questions;
nevertheless each supplies wisdom that if supplemented by the others can
advance our joint interests.
The trouble is that
implementing this balance or my suggested replacements presupposes the
existence of a crucial foundation. Ours
may have become a mass techno-commercial society in which our affluence offers
up a multitude of choices, but we will not be able to take advantage of them
without “emotional maturity.”
David Goleman authored
several books about what he calls “EQ.”
He compares this emotional
quotient with IQ, that is, with the intelligence quotient. Both are said to be crucial for social
success, but the way he puts it is that IQ will get us a job, whereas EQ is
essential for keeping it.
Unless we know how to get
along with other humans, we are sure to alienate them. If we can’t read people emotionally or
control our emotional impulses, we are sure to behave in an off-putting
manner. It is, therefore, critical to
understand and master our passions.
While Goleman is partial to
a comparison between EQ and IQ, I prefer to talk about emotional maturity. We are
all born with a full complement of affects.
Some folks may be more sensitive than others; even so, we all feel fear,
anger, guilt, shame, disgust, sadness, and love.
What distinguishes us,
however, is how well we learn to use these emotions. They must all be adequately “socialized” if
our affects are to be helpful to our adult selves. Were we to experience and deploy them the way
that children do, we would be in enormous peril. Our social life would, in fact, come to a
grinding halt.
To illustrate, we all get
angry. Yet how we get angry differs. An
extremely irate infant may literally bite the hand that feeds it. Then again, were an adult to do something comparable,
he would probably go to jail. Adults
must learn to express their irritation verbally—not physically.
Something similar applies to
fear. Adults need to learn the
difference between what is dangerous and what is not. Thus, while a ceiling fan might startle a
baby, a teenager should be able to take this in stride. The teenager should also have learned to
cross a busy street by looking both ways.
Strong emotions must be
controlled or they revert to their infantile forms. Without self-discipline, people behave
inappropriately. They get angry when
they shouldn’t. They get frightened when
they ought not. Worse still, they lash
out when they should keep silent or run away when they should stand and fight.
This is what I mean by
emotional maturity. It is not something
we are born with, but something we develop.
Unlike IQ, it is a competence that we acquire. All of us are able to learn how to be less
afraid. All of us can discover how to
get angry without throwing a tantrum.
What is more, unless we do,
we cannot engage in principled realism.
We would instead be so terrified by reality that we hid under a bushel-basket
of fantasies. We would also be so
enraged by our frustrations that we immorally injured those who got in our way.
Social individualism is correspondingly
impractical in the absence of emotional maturity. We would not be able to make wise choices
because we did not recognize, or honor, our limitations. We would, in fact, be too busy pretending that
we should get everything we desire.
Unfortunately, emotional
maturity is currently in short supply.
We see this in politics. We see
it in the media. We see it in our
entertainments. Everywhere we look,
childishness is in full bloom. Not only
is it ubiquitous; it is celebrated as energetic and optimistic.
Too bad, because in its
ignorance and impulsivity, this sort of immaturity is endangering our
future. A world that is converted into a
puerile sandbox will shortly have all the coherence of a pile of sand.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment