During the Middle Ages, a
widely recognized truism had it that if you intend to kill the king, you had
better kill the king. Because if you
didn’t, the king was unlikely be happy and would probably kill you.
Nowadays, liberal
politicians and mainstream media want to destroy president Trump. They openly declare that he is unworthy of
office and should be impeached.
Nonetheless, if they do not succeed in unseating him, they are apt to be
in jeopardy.
The major line of attack in
recent months has been that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the
election from Clinton. What is more, he
has been accused of trying to cover up his misdeeds by engaging in obstruction
of justice.
The would-be regicides had pinned
their hopes on the ousted Director of the FBI, James Comey. His investigations would, they assumed,
reveal the alleged connections.
Afterwards, even terrified Republicans would pile on a disgraced chief
executive.
Except that this did not
happen. There does not seem to be any
there, there. Even the smoke began to
dissipate once Comey testified before a Senate committee. Although this was a Rorschach test in which
each side saw what it wanted, there was plainly no smoking gun.
But if none is found—if, for
example, Mueller’s independent investigation finds nothing—the Democratic
attack dogs will be in serious trouble.
Their credibility will be ruined and their political support may evaporate.
If the reactions pollsters
found to Comey’s congressional appearance are to be believed, his cowardly
statements horrified Republican and Independent voters. Whether he lied regarding his meetings with
the president, he had clearly not stood firm for justice.
Democratic observers, on the
other hand, were more charitable. While
they did not get the damning evidence they desired, they were more inclined to
believe Comey than Trump.
The trouble is that there
are not enough Democratic voters to save Democratic candidates. Elected officials, who assumed that taking down
Trump would ensure reelection, should be quaking in their boots. Especially if the President passes his signature
legislation, they are apt to be perceived as feckless.
As for the mainstream media,
they covered themselves in no glory. Instead,
they were exposed as dishonest scandalmongers.
When Comey categorized many of their stories as blatantly false, there
was little place to hide. Yet hide some
did by doubling-down on unsubstantiated reports.
Hence the New York Times
would not admit that the unnamed informants for a story about collusion between
Trump advisors and Russian intelligence agents were wrong. Instead, the editors lamely explained that
they were not able to get in touch with these sources. We may wonder why.
Meanwhile, the Washington Post
put together a piece explaining why Trump was still guilty of obstruction of
justice. Eminent lawyers such as Alan
Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley opined otherwise, but these journalists knew
better.
Given the gales of
disinformation raging forth from the media, their reputation has been blown
asunder. Their joint standing is now
lower than a snake’s belly. It has
actually gone subterranean in that they are struggling to escape a coffin of
their own making.
No doubt Trump too has his
troubles. He is painfully inarticulate
and frequently inconsistent. He has also
had difficulty passing a complex legislative agenda. Thus, Republican legislators are divided
about how to proceed, while some still have not forgiven him for his repellent
behavior during the campaign.
That aside, he is not
dead. The man seems to be resilient
despite the incessant assaults he has endured.
We may nevertheless suspect that he has become irritated with the
ambushes. What then if he counterattacks?
Politicians and journalists
alike had better gird their loins. If
the king does not perish, they may find that he has sufficient ammunition to
take them down. They, in fact, are more
vulnerable than he is. To begin with
Comey may have committed crimes. His
leaking might have been illegal.
But it is Barack Obama,
Hillary Clinton, and their minions who are in real hot water. Because they are no longer in office, but
also because a discredited media is less able to protect them, their earlier transgressions
could land them before a grand jury.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment