During the Democratic
National Convention, Vice-President Joe Biden said something that is patently
absurd, but extraordinarily revealing of the liberal mentality. His audience—and the media—should have been
taken aback. Instead they cheered
wildly.
What did he say that was so
ridiculous? What line was extoled as
brilliant, but is actually evidence of shallow and egotistical thinking? Why is was that “we own the finish line.”
By this Biden meant that the
United States is first and always will be.
We have the best economy, the strongest military, and the most moral
people. Others—especially Republicans—must
stop putting us down because we are inherently the world’s foremost superpower.
It was clear that Biden
regards this status as an entitlement.
We do not have to earn it. It is
ours merely as a result of who we are.
We are simply THE BEST—period—exclamation point!
Our vice president has, of
course, long since demonstrated that he is a man of limited intellect. He obviously does not know history. There was a time when Rome owned the finish
line—then the barbarians ended their reign.
There was also a time when China owned the finish line—yet the Mongols
and Manchus sent them into eclipse.
At various times, the
Spanish, the French, and the English have likewise claimed the mantle of natural
superiority. None, however, was able to
maintain it. Why then should we be
different? What is there about us that
exempts us from the competition that might eventually bring us down?
Biden is not alone in his
narrow-minded smugness. It is
characteristic of the progressive mindset.
These folks regard our economic and military dominance as a given. As a consequence, we do not have to do
anything to preserve it. Our ascendency
is effectively a golden goose that can be plucked, mutilated, and starved of
nourishment with impunity.
It therefore follows that the
American people deserve every freebee the liberals can ladle their way. Citizens of the United States do not have to
work for these things. They do not have
to sacrifice or make do with less than they desire. That would be unjust. Everyone—including illegal immigrants—is to
be provided with the comforts of our limitless prosperity.
This means that taxes can be
raised on the wealthy without reducing the capital needed for investment. It means that regulations, which cost
business trillions a year, can be expanded without limit. As Americans, a free lunch is manifestly our
due.
And so we bust the budget to
provide elective medical care—such as sex change operations. We likewise go blithely into debt such that we
will soon owe more on interest than we spend on welfare or defense. Many progressives also want us to cut back on
policing, regardless of whether our inner cities become sinkholes of despair.
The Romans fell to the
Germanic hordes because they preferred to live in luxury rather than defend
themselves. The Chinese turned inward
and hence failed to recognize imminent threats.
Meanwhile, the Spanish used American gold and silver to purchase extravagances,
instead of developing Iberian industry.
Are we in the process of
doing something comparable? Life demands
choices and determination. The notion
that we can have it all without growing our economy or strengthening our military
is childish.
When I was a teenager—and a
socialist—I argued that an affluent society should leave no one behind. Everyone ought therefore be provided with a
minimum income by the federal government.
None needed to work. A kind of
reverse taxation could be automatic.
Much like contemporary
liberals, I regarded this as elementary justice. It was blatantly unfair that anyone possess
more than anyone else. In a society as
rich as ours, it was self-evidently incumbent upon us to share with the needy. Moreover, demands for effort would only worsen
their lot.
This attitude has become
part of the liberal creed. It would seem
that because we are American, we all deserve trophies—even if we don’t show up.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment