Once dodge ball was
ubiquitous. Almost every middle school
in the nation expected students to play this game. In gym classes, two teams would be organized
to throw soccer balls at one another, with the last student who remained untouched
declared the winner.
This diversion was regarded
as great exercise and an excellent way to encourage competition. But, with the rise of liberalism, this activity
came to be regarded as barbaric. Instead
of promoting cooperation, it urged teenagers to inflict symbolic injuries. This would not do.
I, however, loved dodge
ball. One reason was that I was good at
it. Because I was neither very big nor
strong, I wasn’t going to be a star in football or basketball. I was nonetheless quick and agile, and hence
well equipped to get out of the way of a ball aimed at me.
Still, it was another
ability that ensured I was generally one of the last players standing. It was my strategy. I did not play the game the way most of my
peers did. Almost all of them gathered
together in a defensive cluster. Their
idea was to protect themselves behind a wall of others.
As for me, I stood
alone. My aim was to be as far away as I
could. This was judged foolish in that
it apparently defied the other side to take me out. After
all, I was a well-defined target. Why
not show me I was vulnerable?
But that is not usually how
it worked out. The opposition habitually
aimed at the target rich scrum. They
calculated that if they missed one person, there was a good chance of hitting
another. In this, they were correct.
Moreover, the crowd made it
more difficult for individual players to recognize when they were targeted. Because others obscured their view, they
might not see the ball coming. This made
it difficult to react appropriately.
With me, it was
different. Because I stood alone, it was
absolutely clear when someone aimed at me.
Furthermore, I had the room to get away.
With no one standing next to me, there was no one hindering my lateral movement. This permitted me to take advantage of my
agility.
Why do I bring this up? My teenage days are far behind me. Besides, no one has directed a dodge ball at
me in decades. Nor do I expect kudos for
modest achievements that occurred ages ago.
So what is the point?
As I ponder the changes that
have come upon our society, like others I have contemplated what the future
holds. My conclusion is that liberalism
is about to expire and will be replaced by “social individualism.” Since our society is becoming more complex,
it will be necessary for more people to be self-motivated experts.
Yet those who are
self-directed need the courage to make independent decisions. If they are to make full use of their skills,
they must be willing to take risks.
Although their autonomous choices could be wrong, they cannot otherwise bring
their abilities to bear.
If so, more people need to
be capable of operating as individuals.
They will require the personal fortitude to stand alone, even though
they might be blamed for their mistakes.
Just like me, when I played dodge ball, they will often have to separate
themselves from the crowd.
Rugged individualism was
once a hallmark of what it meant to be an American. The pioneers of yore took amazing chances to
bring our nation’s potential to fruition.
But the same is true of us. If
our country is not to fall into decline, we must be the one’s to save it.
Nonetheless, many people
find individualism frightening. They are
afraid that if they stand out, they will become a target. In fact, they may. But this need not make them defenseless. If they remain alert, and know what they are
doing, they too can get out of the way.
As for myself, I enjoy the
idea of being a sturdy individual. I
want some of my triumphs to be my own.
That, however, does not mean I am unwilling to work with others. To the contrary, I am pleased to contribute
to common causes. Why, indeed, can’t our
nation be a tapestry of hardy individuals dedicated to their own and each other’s
welfare?
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment