By 1990, the conventional
wisdom had it that big cities were ungovernable. Places like New York City were regarded as
sinkholes of despair. Festooned in
graffiti, and plagued by crime, their mayors and police departments had lost
control.
Two decades earlier, while a
student at the City University of New York’s Graduate Center, I watched my
professors struggle with the task of rehabilitating Times Square. Unfortunately, their social engineering did
not help.
Then came Rudi
Giuliani. He decided to fight crime instead
of surrendering to it. The police were
told to arrest people even for small infractions—such as turnstile jumping. They were also unleashed to engage in
pro-active interventions in violent neighborhoods.
The results were dramatic. Crime plummeted. The murder rate, for instance, fell by almost
three quarters. People again felt safe. They even returned to the newly cleaned up
Times Square to celebrate their liberation from squalor.
But this did not satisfy the
liberal pundits who ran the New York Times.
They regarded Giuliani as the enemy.
He was perceived as a monster who was oppressing the poor. Instead of being nice to the downtrodden, he insisted
that they follow the law—or pay a penalty.
And so the Times fought
back. It ran hundreds of articles about
police brutality. Despite statistical
evidence that police abuses had been reduced, aberrant cases, such at that of
Amadou Diallo, were highlighted to demonstrate just how vicious the authorities
were.
Today the clock has been
turned back and Freddie Gray is the new poster boy for police cruelty. Without knowing the facts, cries for revenge
rose from Baltimore’s mean streets.
Worse still, the city’s elected officials echoed these calls. They agreed that without justice there would
be no peace.
And so the police were
scapegoated. Instead of putting down the
rioters, they were asked to expose themselves to the brickbats of an unruly
mob. Meanwhile the officers suspected of
injuring Gray were indicted for second-degree murder on the theory that they
intentionally killed their prisoner.
The upshot: back on the
streets there were celebrations.
Vengeance, disguised as justice, had won the day. Now the Crips and Bloods were hailed as
heroes for maintaining the peace. It did
not matter that they directed vandals to loot Asian businesses. Hadn’t they, after all, protected their own?
This, however, was not
justice. It was a return to a State of Nature
in which it is every person for him/herself.
Millennia have gone into developing the institutions that shield
ordinary citizens from chaos. Yet these
were brushed aside as if they were the problem.
With the Al Sharpton’s of
the world now dictating the terms of surrender, the worst is yet to arrive. Baltimore is about to become Detroit
East. Legitimate businesses will flee
the city, as will its respectable residents.
Nor will the cops do their job.
Why should they risk being sent to jail for apprehending evildoers?
So who is responsible? It is none other than the liberal champion of
justice in the White House. Intent on
vindicating his ideological convictions, Obama is determined to do what the New
York Times could not. He aims to
dismantle law and order in favor of a squishy niceness.
Baltimore’s mayor decided to
provide the looters space to foul their own nest. This could only be achieved by disarming the
police. Yet this policy was well under
way. From Cambridge Massachusetts to
Ferguson Missouri, our president had already condemned law enforcement agents
for having gone wild.
Nevertheless, Obama and his
allies do not know what a lack of control portends. With the gangs and incompetent public
officials in charge, there will be blood on the streets. Once the law is fully dismantled, no one will
be safe.
This is not justice. It is insanity. Ordinary police officers are not
perfect. They make mistakes. Moreover, they should be punished when they
do. But destroying law and order is a
far greater mistake—with more serious consequences.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment