When I give talks around
Cobb and Cherokee counties, I am often asked why colleges are such liberal
places. Although Kennesaw State
University is more balanced than most, the public perception is that higher
education is pervaded by left-leaning ideologues.
The fact is that most of our
colleges and universities are skewed dangerously toward “progressive”
ideas. Too many professors perceive
their task as converting their students to an “enlightened” social
perspective. They do not educate so much
as indoctrinate.
This tilt is especially
pronounced in the humanities and social sciences. Sadly it is more marked in my own discipline
of sociology than in most. Yet this does
not have to be. There are good ideas on
both sides of the political spectrum; hence they could be presented with
greater symmetry.
Once upon a time it was
assumed that colleges should be “marketplaces of ideas.” They were thought to be bastions of learning
where new insights were continuously developed in a give-and-take of competing
academics. This way the wheat could be
winnowed from the chafe such that the best positions survived.
But more than this, if
colleges were level playing fields on which young adults could compare a multitude
of conflicting viewpoints, these students could decide for themselves what was
true. In this way, they would not only
learn about the world, but also about how to learn.
One of the most crucial
skills needed to succeed in the contemporary world is how to engage in independent thinking. Those persons who hope to become tomorrow’s
leaders must be able to sift through—often on their own—a variety of different
solutions before they settle on what is likely to work.
As most persons in stations
of authority know, it is not always clear how to proceed. Indeed, the more complicated the project, the
greater the number of uncertainties that are strewn along the path. This makes it essential to weigh the options
before coming to a conclusion.
Our colleges and
universities should be the place where the next generation of leaders learns
how to achieve this. But students cannot
develop this capacity if they are not allowed to practice it. And they cannot practice it unless they are
exposed to differing intellectual perspectives.
This being the case, many of
us at KSU are promoting the goal of moving the school toward becoming an ever
more effective marketplace of ideas. We
want the university to be a hotbed of lively discussions and innovative
thought. We hope to make it a center intellectual
exuberance fitting for the capital of the New South.
To this end we are launching
a series of KSU Marketplace of Ideas Days. Our intention is do these every term starting
with Tuesday November 12 at 7PM.
Students, faculty and the public are all welcome to attend what promises
to be a dynamic event in the main auditorium of our Social Sciences Building
(SS1021).
Last year Dr. Ken White (a
political scientist) and I engaged in a pre-election debate over the
comparative merits of Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. The sparks flew and passions were set aflame. This time our Great Debate will concern the
merits of Obamacare. No doubt there may once
again be a few disagreements.
We are also bringing in Dr.
Jonathan Imber of Wellesley College to be our featured speaker. A nationally respected scholar and the editor
of the journal Society, he will discuss the ins-and-outs regarding teaching
about conservatism on college campuses.
In the future, we also hope
to put together panel discussions concerning topical issues. These will showcase students, faculty, and
members of the community on both sides of important questions. The objective is to have vital subjects energetically
presented by committed advocates—who just happen to differ in their
allegiances.
Ideas matter. Independent thinking matters. None of us, and certainly not institutions of
higher learning, should shy from examining the truth—just because it is
controversial.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment