We were warned against
it. We were told that it would be unwise
to discuss political matters over Thanksgiving.
The levels of partisanship have risen to such heights that we might be
unable to recover from the vicious recriminations hurled over a roasted turkey’s
carcass.
Actually, when, last year,
we assembled at my brother’s house for the magnificent feast he always
provides, we held our tongues. My
brother and his wife were in mourning.
As die-hard liberals, they had not come to terms with Trump’s
victory. Rubbing it in would have been unkind.
This year was another
matter. The day began well enough. At first, we were too busy admiring Joel’s
new Florida home to be concerned with politics.
Then, after his in-laws arrived, we were too busy getting acquainted to
deal with the news.
Only after most folks went
home did the partisan fireworks flare up.
All of a sudden, Joel, his wife’s cousin Dale, my wife and I found
ourselves standing in the kitchen sharing our reactions to current events. Under most circumstances, I would have joined
the battle. This time was different.
It was Joel and Dale who traded
opinions with the vigor of medieval knights swinging battle-axes. Joel was liberal as ever, whereas Dale was
more conservative than I. Moreover, since
the two were equally matched, they held their own.
As a bystander, I was
impressed with how frequently they resorted to prepackaged arguments. These were both well-educated paladins. Joel is a successful lawyer. Dale is a successful executive. They were thus well read and abreast of the
news.
The trouble was that in the
heat of the battle they lambasted their opponent with abridged explanations of
why their policies were right the other’s wrong. There was no time for lengthy corroborations. It was make a quick point and prepare to
counter the other’s equally quick rejoinder.
As an academic who studies
social change, I found these kaleidoscopic interchanges too much to bear. They were riven through and through with
over-simplified accounts of history and political theory. The combatant’s goal was evidently to score
an immediate knockout; not to engage in scholarly investigations.
Too often nowadays the need
is to be clever, rather than accurate.
The talking heads we see on television and the tweets we read on our
cell phones jabber past one another.
They do not stop to clarify the details of their arguments. That would be boring. Gentle insults are much more fun.
Nonetheless, one thing I
have learned is that life and society are complicated. If history seems simple, it is because we are
largely unfamiliar with its intricacies.
Likewise, if political maneuverings appear to be clear-cut, it because
we are seldom privy to what goes on behind closed doors.
Hence, when we impute straightforward
motives to politicians—for example, that they are all crooks—we are usually
wrong. Or when we predict that
legislation will have an unambiguous outcome, we are customarily off the mark.
The trouble is that we don’t
like complicated. We want to believe we
are in control of events and this would be impossible if we recognized that we
don’t always understand what is going on.
And so we pare things down to a minimum and imagine this is the whole
ball of wax.
In fact, the world is so
complex that no one ever grasps it in its entirety. We are all to some extent blind. But that does not excuse us from having to
navigate uncharted shoals. We must frequently
make decisions upon which to act or suffer dreadful repercussions. Hence, when we err, we are wise to correct
our mistakes.
Fortunately, although we are
not omniscient, we can be modest. We
can, when we run into unexpected headwinds, ask why. If we are sensible, we pause to examine what
we do not comprehend.
Yet that is not where Americans
currently are. It is as if we are on a
runaway train that is destined to crash if we do not discover the brakes. Our thanksgiving day fights are merely temporary
diversions. Feelings get hurt, but
people recuperate.
It is on the larger social
stage that we must learn to be more careful.
Ignoring critical complications in this venue could eventuate in the
collapse of our civilization.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment