Joseph Goebbels must be
giggling in his grave. The Nazi propaganda
chief has been dead for well over half a century, but his spirit is very much
alive. Indeed, it has been resurrected
by American liberals who have adopted his techniques for promoting their cause.
Goebbels once opined that if
a lie is told often enough, it will be believed. The lie can be enormous and based on nothing
but a desire to deceive. It can be
outrageous and on its face absurd.
Nonetheless, if it is repeated with sufficient regularity, it will begin
to sound like the truth.
The Germans managed this
despite the bizarre nature of some of their claims. First they blamed the Reichstag fire on the
communists. Then they condemned the Jews
for subverting the nation. Then they
actually told the world that the Poles started World War II by attacking
Germany first.
Now we find liberals using
this same playbook against president Trump.
They too have discovered the virtues of repetition, simplicity and consistency. To be credible, an egregious untruth must not
only be reiterated, it must be reiterated in the same streamlined terms. Complexity or inconsistencies would ruin the
effect.
Thus, for the Nazis, either
the communists did it, or the Jews did it, or the Poles did it. Meanwhile, for the liberals, Donald Trump did
it. He ought to be impeached because he
ruined the country and sabotaged the constitution. But most of all, he collaborated with the
Russians to win the election.
How often have we been told that
the Trump team colluded with the Russians?
How frequently has it been suggested that our president is a puppet of
Vladimir Putin? The evidence for this
does not matter. That it is totally
absent is no determent to an endless loop of accusations.
James Clapper, the former
director of the National Intelligence Agency has recurrently said that he has
seen no evidence of collusion. But this
is discounted. Actually it is
ignored. Senator Diane Feinstein has
said virtually the same. At best, she
has lamely alluded to unsourced newspaper stories. Yet her words too have disappeared into the
ether.
What has held center stage
is the drip, drip, drip, from reporter after reporter and politician after
politician. They all say the same
thing. Where there is smoke, there must
be fire. They do not, of course, confess
that they created the smoke and are assiduously fanning it. That might generate doubts.
And so the big lie roles
along, night after night, on TV channel after TV channel, and during the day in
newspaper after newspaper, and twenty-four hours a day on the Internet. First, the New York Tines concocts a fairy
tale, then the Washington Post picks it up.
Then CNN, MSNBC, and CBS illustrate it and trumpet it around the world.
So consistent has this
sequence been that a recent Harvard study documented that in many cases over
ninety percent of stories told about Trump have been negative. While he gets more attention than previous
presidents, it is uniformly hostile.
The White House advisor
Steve Bannon described the media as the opposition party. Journalists immediately took umbrage. Bannon decried the volume of fake news and
was mocked for misunderstanding the function of a free press.
But the press operates like
an insurrectionist party. A large part
of it has been agitating to remove Trump from office. Resorting to the Goebbels playbook is part
and parcel of this program. The big lie
is supposed to mobilize the American people so that they demand his expulsion. At minimum, it is intended to stop his conservative
agenda in its tracks.
The fact is that the
national journalists and liberal politicians swim in the same Washington
Swamp. Although they pretend to care
about the constitution and our democratic traditions, they do not. As self-declared socialists, they are actually
power hungry totalitarians.
The goal of contemporary
liberals is plainly to change America.
And they don’t care how they do it.
The first step is therefore to fool voters as to what is happening. That is the purpose of the big lie. The question is: will it work?
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment