When I was in high school,
my teachers regularly warned about the dangers of conformity. They feared that the nation was becoming too
materialist and hence that we students might be tempted to join the ranks
corporate executives garbed in grey flannel suits.
What could be more
enervating than this fate? What could be
more drearily boring? We, the upcoming
generation, were thus advised never to lose our idealism. We must stand up for truth and justice and
not allow our country to slide into self-satisfied vacuity.
The current generation of
college students has been steeped in similar guidance all of their lives. They too believe the liberal mantra that it
is up to them to save jaded adults from a burned-out conventionality. The young must lead. They must exploit their superior wisdom to
join the vanguard of a brave new world.
The paradox at the heart of
this recommendation is that the idealistic young are now more conformist than
in my day. My peers were asked to avoid
the quagmire of excessive acquisitiveness.
The current crew is invited to do the same, but also to become combatants
in the battle for social justice.
The irony is that this
liberal agenda is more conformist than the materialist one. The budding businessmen and women of yore at
least had to be innovative, if they were to get ahead. Today’s left-wing political agitators have
merely to chant time worn slogans and wave vitriolic posters.
Progressivism is not progressive. Its minions have not had an original thought
in nearly a century. They always want
the same thing, which is to say, more government control. Accordingly, down with the oppressors and up
with bureaucratic regulations and programs.
Reality is somewhat
different. Ours is a mass
techno-commercial society. A market
economy and democratic institutions of this sort demand an independence of
thought and a willingness to take risks.
More people need to become self-motivated experts who are able to make
competent decisions in a world filled with uncertainties.
University-bound snowflakes
revel in the opposite. They cannot stand
uncertainty. When confronted with ideas
different from their own, they melt.
Instead they demand ideological uniformity. Subversive concepts are offensive and therefore
forbidden.
Somehow this regimentation
is supposed to promote freedom. With the
poor and minorities protected by social justice warriors, these folks will be
liberated to carry on without interference.
They will thus be spared elite oppression. Well—not entirely. The weak too will have to toe the politically
correct line or face remediation.
The truth is that the
professionalized jobs of the future require self-direction. Technical and social experts must be able to
make independent decisions. They cannot
rely on bosses to tell them what to do.
Even less can they depend on all-encompassing regulations imposed by benevolent
politicians and bureaucrats.
The world is becoming a more
complicated place, one that requires personal flexibility. Doctors, engineers, as well as police
officers, need the courage to make autonomous choices, as well as to engage in the
life-long learning essential to honing their skills.
Snowflakes demand the reverse. They do not believe in courage. Instead they want safe places where they can
be protected from micro-aggressions. Nor
they do not want to learn from others.
As far as they are concerned, the already know what they need to know.
Our overwhelmingly liberal colleges
have therefore ceased to do what they ought to do. They do not foster a marketplace of
ideas. They do not ask students to deal
with differing opinions. No, they
specialize in the new conformity.
When colleges disinvite
speakers because mobs of student agitators threaten to riot, they are teaching
the young how to be model storm troopers.
When professors rant about the allegedly fascist tendencies of president
Trump and then grade students down if they disagree; they promote a mindless
orthodoxy.
The saddest part is that
this is not about to change. College
campuses are so dominated by political correctness that dissent can find no
space to take root. In other words, the
snowflakes are safe. The intellectual
chill is so pervasive they need not thaw out.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment