Tuesday, February 13, 2018

How to Ruin a University


The economy is catching fire.  Wages are going up.  Americans are measurably more optimistic about what the future holds.  So what do the Georgia governor, the legislators and the Board of Regents do?  They decide to commit arson.  They agree to burn down a big chunk of the University System of Georgia.
While everyone else is getting raises, we at Kennesaw State University are receiving neither merit nor cost of living adjustments.  In the past, we were asked to do belt tightening when state revenues decreased.  Now we are told to do so as they are about to rise.
The cat is finally out of the bag.  It is plain that the authorities intend to dismantle state sponsored higher education.  Their goal is evidently to starve places like KSU into second-rate institutions.
Let me explain.  I have published sixteen books, edit a professional journal, write columns for the MDJ and Cherokee Tribune, direct a non-profit foundation and am a first rate teacher, but I earn less than some elementary school counselors and many police officers.
Meanwhile my wife, who also teachers at KSU and received the highest possible evaluation in terms of her teaching, scholarship, and service, will likewise earn not a single additional dime this year.
What makes this especially galling is that the lowest level of college administrators earn tens of thousands more.  Indeed, upper-level administrators are paid hundreds of thousands more.  In one case in my own college, a newly hired department chair obtained twice what I do, despite my achievements and quarter-century of service.
On top of this, there is the problem of compression.  Freshly hired professors must be paid more in order to entice them to come, whereas full professors receive crumbs.  The difference between a novice and a seasoned professional can therefore be as little as six thousand dollars.
Worse yet, recently revised salary policies exacerbate this problem.  The purported solutions only tighten the differences between the top and bottom.  So I ask you, where is the incentive to do a good job?  Why jump through hoops to be promoted when there is no reward for doing so?
Many readers may say this is no more than what professors deserve.  As left-wing hacks, they merit as little compensation as possible.  Nonetheless, if this policy continues, even less qualified folks will be attracted to academe.  Why expend the time and effort to become a competent Ph.D., if at the end of the road there is penury and disrespect?
The powers that be seem not to care.  Complete Georgia demonstrates that their chief concern is what looks good on paper.  If they can boast of more college graduates in less time, it matters not one whit if these alumnae have learned anything.
And so we get increased stress on online learning.  Once decent rubrics are in place, masters and bachelor level employees can administer them.  Who needs expensive professors to inspire intellectual growth or produce new knowledge?  Eliminating them drastically reduces costs, while ostensibly making higher education available to everyone.
In the end, what we will get is a two-tier system.  On the top will be a few elite private and public schools that are open only to the super rich and super bright.  Everyone else will be stuck with what amount to diploma mills.  Theoretically they will get college degrees, while in reality they will have received neither the knowledge nor the attitudes to obtain well paying jobs.
Here then is the supreme irony.  In an effort to give everyone a college education, many fewer will receive one.  Policies that are expected to promote social mobility do the reverse.  The votes of the poor will thus have been purchased with assurances of social success, whereas they will remain mired in the same old places.
This is a horror story.  Americans have grown so accustomed to empty political promises that they have difficulty distinguishing fact from fiction.  They are told about the astonishing improvements to expect from modernization, but seldom recognize the repugnant consequences.
Well, you may think, Dr. Fein is not a disinterested observer.  In this you would be correct; I am not.  Yet I am a person with first hand knowledge of a dire situation and a fervent interest promoting genuine learning.  That should count for something.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology

Kennesaw State University

No comments:

Post a Comment