The term “propaganda”
entered our lexicon thanks to the Roman Catholic Church’s “Congregation for the
Propagation of the Faith.” Created by pope
Gregory XV in 1622, it was charged with the dissemination of information
favorable to the Vatican’s mission.
Earlier, in 1559, pope Paul
IV had initiated the “Index of Prohibited Books.” These were works deemed antithetical to the
true faith and therefore which could not be printed or read. Both of these programs were launched as part
of the Counter-Reformation. With
Protestantism gaining momentum, the Church sought means, however heavy-handed,
to crush it.
Today, with Liberalism under
assault, it has resorted to comparable tactics.
Despite talk about transparency, censorship and bias have become the
order of the day. The Obama
administration and the mainstream media are more interested in promoting an authorized
perspective than in sharing the truth.
Bias is nothing new in
politics. Three thousand years ago, with
the advent of writing, Ramses II ordered Stella constructed that boasted of his
enormous victory over the Hittites. The
battle had, in fact, been a draw, but news of that would have been bad for the
Pharaoh’s reputation.
What is different today is
the extent of the bias and the sophistication of the technology used to
propagate it. The liberal establishment,
whether in government, the media, or academe, is dedicated to non-stop
distortion of the facts. If these must
be suppressed, that’s no problem. If
they need to be turned on their head; so be it.
Back when progressivism was
in full flower, things were different.
Teddy Roosevelt believed in the agenda he was promoting. He did not feel a need to disguise it. As a result, he could bring journalists such
as Lincoln Stephens and Ray Baker into his office to candidly share his
opinions.
Barack Obama pretends to do
the same, but journalists know they are being manipulated. Most go along with this because they agree
with his policies. While they may
grumble in private, in public they pass along the party line. The phony statistics about ObamaCare provide
a good example.
The extent of this
misinformation has been revealed in Sharyl Attkinsson’s excellent new book Stonewalled:
My Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and
Harassment in Obama’s Washington.
Attkinsson was a star
reporter at CBS until she ran into the network’s version of the “Congregation
for the Propagation of the Faith.” Literally told that the news department did
not intend to embarrass the president, the sort of investigative reporting she
had done under Bush was now unwelcome.
Time and again, stories that
challenged the orthodox views on Fast and Furious, Green Energy, and Benghazi
got canceled—especially if they were hard hitting. While reporters were complicit in this
censorship, the weightiest measures came from editors who had axes to grind.
As for the government, it is
today riven with public relations offices.
Each agency has its own PR staff, the mission of which is to publicize
favorable stories and quash unfavorable ones.
They are not in the business of informing the public, but in seeing to
it that it is deceived.
Why? The answer is simple. It is for the same reason that the Roman
Catholic Church resorted to propaganda.
If is for the identical reason that the pope Paul V ordered Galileo
never to publish his work on a heliocentric universe, and then placed him under
house arrest.
The Church was frightened by
the success of Luther and Calvin. Too
many of the faithful had been converted to Protestantism. This trend needed to to be reversed
regardless of the consequences.
Today, liberalism is under
siege. It policies have failed to
deliver on the economy, health care, education, race relations, crime, foreign
policy, and so forth. This cannot be
admitted out loud; ergo the blizzard of lies and suppression.
Why does the public tolerate
this? Almost everyone is aware of the
deception. Are we too complicit in
protecting an antiquated faith?
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw StateUniversity
No comments:
Post a Comment