Many years ago, when my
younger sister and I fought, my mother would ask me to allow Carol to have her
way. Someone, she said, has to be the
reasonable one and since you are older that is your responsibility. You must understand her even if she cannot
understand you.
The result was that Carol
tended to get what she wanted more frequently than I did. No doubt she would disagree. Nevertheless I was the one regularly lectured
on being reasonable. Now, as an adult, I
discover that not much has changed.
There are still times when I am required to be reasonable because others
are not.
Congressional Republicans
must currently deal with a quandary not unlike the one I first faced when I was
four. They too find themselves
confronting an adversary that will not give an inch. Consequently, they too are told to be
reasonable; “You know you can’t win, so give up!”
No doubt Democrats also
believe they are being reasonable in their budgetary intransigence. As they see it, they are on the side of the
angels in both the Obamacare funding and debt ceiling battles. Because victory in each of these is deemed
absolutely necessary, they bridle at Republican resistance.
Yet which side is it that
has insisted there can be no negotiations?
And which side is it that has said No to virtually every compromise sent
from the House to the Senate? And which
side is it that daily hammers its opponents with epithets indicating that they
are vicious and uncaring?
Oh, I know that the on-going
political battle is generally depicted as a childish food fight in which both
sides are equally responsible. I also
know that the Republicans are charged with initiating the fracas because they
attached a rider to the budget bill defunding Obamacare.
But if you observe what has
happened, you find a decided lack of symmetry.
Both the president and congressional Democrats have called Republicans
terrorists, arsonists, anarchists, extremists, extortionists and
jihadists. Yet in return, the
Republicans have usually limited themselves to decrying Obama’s lack of leadership
and depicting Obamacare as a train wreck in the making.
By the same token, Democrats
routinely charge Republicans with being reckless and needlessly shutting down
the government. Republicans are also
said to be placing the entire global economy at risk. Why is it, however, that if things are this
bad, Democrats have refused to offer counter-proposals—except do things entirely
their way?
Ever since the time of
Alexis de Tocqueville, the genius of the American democratic system has been
that opposed parties are willing to compromise.
The one glaring exception, of course, concerned slavery and it resulted
in a civil war during which more Americans lost their lives than in any other
of our wars.
Obama and his allies,
unfortunately, spurn compromise. They
even reject budgetary stopgaps as “piecemeal” and thus unacceptable. As one of the president’s own advisors recently
divulged, their goal is to utterly destroy the Republicans. They want a complete victory whatever the
collateral damage.
For my own part, I consider
this attitude absolutely unreasonable.
Some Republicans may have overshot the mark. The Democrats, however, refuse even to enter
a conversation. This approach, though
they pose otherwise, is immature and out of keeping with our nation’s
traditions.
If the American people do
not realize this, and if the media chorus continues to distort realities, they too
are complicit in undermining a political practice that has made America
great. The notions that “we won the
election” and that Obamacare is “the law of the land”, and that therefore the
other side must shut up and be satisfied with nothing is profoundly
anti-democratic.
So what should Republicans
do? The lesson I learned as a child was
that being reasonable can make you vulnerable to unreasonable people. What I also learned is that the best response
is to continue being reasonable. In the
long run, descending to the level of a childish foe is dangerous for all
concerned.
Melvyn L. Fein, Ph.D.
Professor of Sociology
Kennesaw State University
No comments:
Post a Comment